本文已被:浏览 148次 下载 188次 |
 码上扫一扫! |
|
海底油气管道焊接接头的安全评定 |
邓彩艳1, 张玉凤1, 霍立兴1, ZHANGLi1,2, 白秉仁2, 李小巍2, 曹军2
|
1.天津大学 材料科学与工程学院, 天津 300072;2.中国海洋石油工程股份有限公司, 天津 300452
|
|
摘要: |
采用欧共体提出的结构完整性评定方法SINTAP(Structural Integrity Assessment Procedure),针对API5LX65管线钢焊接接头焊趾处的表面裂纹和埋藏裂纹进行安全评定。评定是在给定裂纹尺寸和载荷条件下,应用有限元分析,根据CTOD(裂纹尖端张开位移)试验结果进行的。同时根据母材和全焊缝拉伸试验结果,建立了X65管线钢焊接接头的一级、三级评定曲线。评定结果表明,不论是采用一级或是三级评定,各评定点均在评定曲线定义的范围内,说明该结构是安全的。将SINTAP安全评定方法应用于管道结构,为SINTAP在国内管道结构安全评定中的应用奠定了基础。 |
关键词: SINTAP 失效评定图 安全评定 管道焊接 |
DOI: |
分类号: |
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(50375109);中国海洋石油工程股份有限公司资助项目 |
|
Safe assessment for welded joint of offshore pipeline |
DENG Cai-yan1, ZHANG Yu-feng1, HUO Li-xing1, ZHANG Li1,2, BAI Bing-ren2, LI Xiao-wei2, CAO Jun2
|
1.School of Material Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;2.Offshore Oil Engineering Co. LTD, Tianjin 300452, China
|
Abstract: |
Structure integrity assessment procedure (SINTAP) sponsored by the European commission was applied to assessment for welded joints of the API 5L X65 pipeline steel with embedded flaw and surface flaw at the weld toe. Given crack size and load, the assessment was carried out according to the crack tip opening displacement test result and using finite element analysis. The failure lines of level 1 and 3 of the weld were derived from the tensile test results. The assessment showed that all assessment points are located within the failure lines of analysis level 1 and 3. Therefore, welded joint of the pipeline is safe. This study laid the foundation of application of SINTAP to pipeline structure assessment. |
Key words: structure integrity assessment procedure failure assessment diagram safe assessment |